Amendments proposed to Venezuela's
constitution increasing presidential emergency powers would jeopardize the
protection of fundamental rights at times when they are most needed, Human
Rights Watch said today.
The proposed changes would eliminate the constitutional prohibition on
suspending due process guarantees during states of emergency. They would also
eliminate specific time limits on states of emergency, giving the president de
facto power to suspend due process and other basic rights indefinitely.
Human Rights Watch is particularly concerned that these provisions could lead to suspension of fundamental rights in violation of international law, as the proposed amendments would also eliminate the requirement that such restrictions meet the requirements, principles, and guarantees established in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights.
These amendments would enable President Chávez to suspend basic rights indefinitely by maintaining a perpetual state of emergency, said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch.
Suspension of Due Process Guarantees
President Hugo Chávez's supporters in the National Assembly originally
proposed completely eliminating the constitutional prohibition on
suspending due process rights during states of emergency.
This proposal would allow the president to suspend other fundamental due process guarantees, including the presumption of innocence, the right to be tried by an independent and impartial tribunal, the right against self-incrimination, the right not to be convicted for a non-existent crime, and the right against double jeopardy. In addition, the proposal appears to allow for the suspension of the rights of a defendant to know the charges and have access to the evidence against him.
Other Fundamental Rights at Risk
Under the proposed amendment, the constitution would explicitly
protect a number of rights from suspension during states of emergency.
These include the right to life, the right to personal integrity, the
right not to be sentenced to prison terms exceeding 30 years, and the
prohibitions against torture, incommunicado detention and enforced
disappearance.
The proposed emergency powers would also allow the president to suspend indefinitely the right of citizens to information, a right that is integral to the protection of human rights and accountability.
Expansion of the President's Emergency Decree Power The proposed changes would greatly enhance the president's power to impose and maintain the states of emergency in which these basic rights could be suspended.
It would broaden the circumstances in which the president could impose states of emergency, to include not only catastrophes, calamities and other similar situations, but also cases where a certain and imminent possibility exists for the occurrence of situations capable of originating catastrophes, public calamities and other similar situations. This is of concern, because, as the UN Human Rights Committee has made clear, not every disturbance or catastrophe qualifies as a public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and would justify restrictions or suspension of protected rights.
The proposal would eliminate the existing time limits on states of emergency, leaving it entirely to the discretion of the president to determine when an emergency has ended. Under the proposed amendments, the president would still be required to seek congressional approval for an emergency decree (within an eight-day period), but would not need authorization to extend it. The proposal would also eliminate the power of the National Assembly to revoke the state of emergency.
The reform would also eliminate the requirement that the Supreme Court review the constitutionality of the decree regulating the suspension of rights during times of emergency. Although the proposed amendment indicates that rights should only be suspended temporarily, it provides no mechanism for ending the suspension so long as the state of emergency remains in place.
Source: HRW.ORG
On Digg.com: